by nicola » Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:19 am
This author approached Hartmut Fuess back in 2008. She says that
> He kindly promised me to rewrite my related extinction work within
> two years for the next edition of Vol. C, ITCr. ( around 5 pages). I
> promised him I can carry it out successfully.
Carol Brock's summary of all the material we have received from Hu is attached.
Information on reviewers for Hu's Acta A papers: The 2010 and 2004 papers
were handled by Dieter Schwarzenbach (
[email protected]) as
Co-editor. He might be prepared to act as a reviewer, or his own private
archives might say who the reviewers were (we don't have a record of this in
our system, unfortunately). The papers had the codes sh0190 and sh0178. The
2012 paper was handled by Steve Wilkins as Co-editor (since passed away), and
was reviewed by Andrew Stevenson,
[email protected], and Garry
McIntyre,
[email protected]. It required two rounds of revision before the
reviewers were happy. Both reviewers agreed that the tables should be
deposited.
- Attachments
-
- Hu_Files.pdf
- Carol Brock's summary of material from Hua-Chen Hu
- (69.27 KiB) Downloaded 28987 times
This author approached Hartmut Fuess back in 2008. She says that
> He kindly promised me to rewrite my related extinction work within
> two years for the next edition of Vol. C, ITCr. ( around 5 pages). I
> promised him I can carry it out successfully.
Carol Brock's summary of all the material we have received from Hu is attached.
Information on reviewers for Hu's Acta A papers: The 2010 and 2004 papers
were handled by Dieter Schwarzenbach (
[email protected]) as
Co-editor. He might be prepared to act as a reviewer, or his own private
archives might say who the reviewers were (we don't have a record of this in
our system, unfortunately). The papers had the codes sh0190 and sh0178. The
2012 paper was handled by Steve Wilkins as Co-editor (since passed away), and
was reviewed by Andrew Stevenson,
[email protected], and Garry
McIntyre,
[email protected]. It required two rounds of revision before the
reviewers were happy. Both reviewers agreed that the tables should be
deposited.
